Empowering young minds, shaping the future
At Sandford Hill Primary School, we are dedicated to providing a warm and welcoming environment for children and families. Our school is committed to ensuring that every child achieves their full potential and develops into a responsible, caring, and confident individual.
Our Services
We offer a range of services to support the academic, social, and emotional development of our pupils. Our services include:
Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS)
- Nursery provision for children aged 3-4 years old
- Full-time nursery provision for 39 children
- 15 hours of funded nursery provision Monday to Friday 9.00 a.m. - 12.00 p.m.
- 16 hours of funded nursery provision Monday to Friday 9.00 a.m. - 3.30 p.m. for working parents of 16 hours or more a week
Key Stage 1 and 2
- Learning programs for children aged 4-11 years old
- Curriculum that includes English, mathematics, science, history, geography, art, and physical education
Remote Education Provision
- Online remote education through Microsoft Teams
- Access to Office 365 and Microsoft Teams for all children
- Online resources and learning materials for remote education
Governing Body
- A team of dedicated governors who oversee the strategic direction of the school
- Governors are responsible for setting school policies and making key decisions
Admissions
- Admission applications for new students are managed by Stoke-on-Trent City Council
- Standard admissions number set by the council is 60 pupils per year group
- Nursery places are full-time, 30 hours a week
Contact Us
To contact us, please call 01782 235518 or 235781, or email office@sandfordhill.org.uk. Follow us on social media through the links above.
Overall Impression
The reviewers' overall impression of Maple Court has been overwhelmingly positive. According to Shamaine X, their cousins have raved about the place, and Shamaine is confident that it is 100% better than Maple Court.
Comparison to Maple Court
Shamaine's review highlights the significant difference in their opinion between Maple Court and the destination in question. While Maple Court is considered to be subpar, the reviewer's cousins have consistently praised the alternative.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the reviewer's glowing endorsement suggests that the destination in question is a standout choice, eclipsing Maple Court in terms of quality and experience.
